Listen To Story Above
A recent poll reveals strong public support for President Trump’s decision to ban transgender individuals from military service. According to Rasmussen Reports, 54% of likely U.S. voters endorse the executive order, with 38% expressing strong approval. In contrast, 41% oppose the policy, including 30% who strongly disagree. The survey, conducted across three days with 1,325 likely voters, shows a 13-point margin favoring the ban.
“An online survey finds that 54% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of Trump’s executive order to discharge military service members who identify as transgender, including 38% who Strongly Approve of the policy,” per Rasmussen Reports. “Forty-one percent (41%) disapprove of discharging transgender service members, including 30% who Strongly Disapprove.”
🚨 JUST ANNOUNCED: President Trump has officially signed an executive order restoring military readiness by banning transgender individuals from service.
Strength, focus, and common sense are BACK in charge.
Promises make, promises KEPT!🇺🇸💥 pic.twitter.com/ov48YIvmGD
— Hank â„¢ (@HANKonX) January 27, 2025
Despite these numbers, the margin of support could be wider if the public fully understood the implications of transgender service members on military effectiveness. The policy raises concerns about medical costs, operational readiness, and unit cohesion. Additionally, the expenses associated with gender transition procedures would burden taxpayers.
The situation draws parallels to the television show M*A*S*H, where Corporal Klinger’s cross-dressing was portrayed as grounds for discharge. The presence of transgender service members might send concerning messages to adversaries about military priorities and readiness.
.@realDonaldTrump Says Transgender People Will Not Be Allowed in the Military.
Amen! It's a combat readiness issue!https://t.co/G7ck0P3CQg pic.twitter.com/wr4efjgwpx
— Gunnery Sergeant Jessie Jane Duff (@JessieJaneDuff) July 26, 2017
While personal freedom allows individuals to make their own lifestyle choices, military service has always had specific requirements and restrictions. The Trump administration’s policy reflects a practical approach to maintaining military effectiveness, prioritizing operational capabilities over social experiments.
This decision aligns with traditional military standards, acknowledging that not everyone qualifies for military service. The administration’s stance demonstrates a commitment to military readiness over ideological considerations, a position that resonates with many voters despite ongoing debate about inclusivity in the armed forces.
